McCains Proposal to Cut Tricare for Retirees and it's Impact Essay

McCains Proposal to Cut Tricare for Retirees and its Impact - Essay ExampleTo support this move, leaders from the Army, Marine Corps, Navy and Air event testified citing the devastating effects would turn over. Unfortunately, these military Leaders were unin directed about the device to cut TRICARE for retirees and its effects. The cuts known as sequestration will have an impact of weapons modernization and soak up levels if the committee does non cut a deal by the deadline. According to Philpott (2011), Senator McCain stated that putting retirees under the age of sixty-five to forcefully social occasion TRICARE standard, health insurance from civilian employers or free-for service among other options would help the department of defense save up to one hundred and eleven cardinal dollars in the coming decade. In McCains view, it would be better to remove the TRICARE deal than take an alternative that would reduce funds for equipment, essential weapon programs and didactics t hat is needed by the military. McCains reason for bringing up the proposal, according to a staff member was to ensure that the super committee picks an option that would not compromise the department of defense, military personnel and their families while maintaining TRICARE provisions (Philpott, 2011). However much this proposal might seem perfect, it is bound to cause more suffering than good. The military personnel will not accept this proposal. ... Cutting the TRICARE prime would make them use other options used by the civilians. This is bound to be high-priced for the military retirees. The premise that restricting military retirees and their families from TRICARE prime would make them avoid spending cuts would not be cost-effective. Cuts must be spent either way. cut back participation in TRICARE prime would not save any cost. Most military working-age retirees are not rich. Cutting them off from TRICARE prime would seriously pamper their financial capacities. Another impa ct the proposal would have is that is has not considered retirees under the age of sixty who do not have additional health insurance, have no employment or are homeless. All military retirees should receive the same treatment from the government. Restricting TRICARE prime against working-age retirees will be a form of discrimination. They choose to get into the military to protect the country. However, they do not choose to retire early. It is because of medical and disabling conditions that arise from work related issues that make force them to retire. Unlike retires over the age of 65, the working-age military retirees retire while young and may not get other employments because of their medical and or disabling conditions. Therefore, this proposal would discriminate on retires based on age. The fact that working age military retirees make up almost half of the percentage of TRICARE eligible commonwealth does not make it right for them to be used as sacrificial lamps in order to save cuts. This would be problematic because there is no exculpation as to why they should be restricted together with their families. Their chances of getting other employment opportunities are as slim as those